Joined in 2023 
82 
63 About this deal
That has an effect, though — the 7950X chip has a 170W TDP rating and a max power draw of 230W, the highest power consumption of any Ryzen chip yet.It's also much higher than the previous-gen Ryzen 9 5950X's 105W TDP rating. As we see with Intel's chip, the 7950X is designed to use the full thermal headroom available to deliver more performance. However, the 7950X has a lower 95C thermal limit, so it will frequently operate at 95C while under heavy load. Unfortunately, their Thinkbook 16p 2022 with AMD H line comes with soldered memory and a maximum of 32GB, and many already need 64. And there is a bad cooling system – this series makes noise even in an office load (L7 is not), and the set of ports is weaker than that of the L7.
The Intel Core i9-13900K vs AMD Ryzen 9 7950X rivalry is a heated battle for supremacy at the top of the mainstream desktop PC market, with Intel's 13th-Gen Raptor Lake with an x86 hybrid architecture squaring off against AMD's chiplet-based Zen 4 Ryzen 7000 family. These two fundamentally different approaches have shaken up our list of the best CPUs for gaming, as the Intel vs AMD battle enters a new phase, but the competition is a bit closer than it might appear on the surface. But favoring higher single core benefits both designer's chips and I recommend it for Intel as well. Every processor is based on an underlying design called an instruction-set architecture. This blueprint determines how the processor understands computer code. Since software operating systems and applications are written to work most efficiently—or sometimes only—on a certain architecture, this is probably the most important decision point for your next processor.It's impressive that AMD has wrung so much performance out of its 12-core Ryzen 9 5900X, yet still manages to consume far less power than Intel's eight-core model. That benefit comes via TSMC's 7nm process, while Intel's 14nm process has obviously reached the end of the road in terms of absolute performance and efficiency. TerryLaze said:How is the desktop marketplace the wrong battlefield for desktop performance/features? One other aspect I will touch on here is the performance on battery use. Both units run at 30W sustained, and the AMD model scores ~20% higher than the Intel model. Don’t expect much in terms of battery life in either case, but if you’re going to run CPU-taxing workloads with the laptop unplugged, the AMD platform is the option to go for.
Given the price, taken together, of the chip and the mandatory adoption of LGA1200, the Intel Core i9-10900K isn't a better deal than the AMD Ryzen 9 5900X for pure productivity, like the tasks reflected here. The Ryzen 9 5900X should be at the top of the list for content creators who need to squeeze every drop of performance out of their machines in a prosumer or a professional work environment with thread-happy software. That’s partially due to the extra Cores/Threads and processing capabilities of the i9-12900H processor, but also due to the fact that the Intel processor runs at ~110W of stabilized power, while the AMD model runs at 90W. However, at 90W the Ryzen 9 already delivers the maximum possible performance, so there’s no need for it to run at higher power, while the i9 could squeeze a few percents faster results if supplied with even more power.So while the Intel i9 has an edge in performance, features, and maybe SKUs over the AMD R9 hardware, in the end, you won’t go wrong with any of these in your next top-tier performance laptop. I’d also even consider going with a mainstream processor as well, in which case this guide on the Intel Core i7-11800H and AMD Ryzen 7 5800H should come in handy. Let’s switch to the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X. It is the chip to look at if you want the top-tier typical AMD performance. It is the member of team red with the most cores and can compete with Intel’s 13900K. This Team Red processor has a 5nm TSMC process, more cache, and an integrated GPU. AMD Ryzen 9 vs Intel Core i9: Features & Specs: Finally, DDR5 memory still costs more than DDR4 memory, providing Intel builders with a further option for more affordable configurations. It does, however, come with a little performance hit for applications and a 4% decrease in games. That increased IPC improvements, along with the massive turbo boost of 4.6GHz mean that even in single core performance – long a weak link of AMD’s processors – comes within reaching distance of Team Blue’s chips.
Most of the market wants the low power features of the iGPU, especially for mobile devices (that some of them do use desktop CPUs now) but even on desktop, being able to sync a movie to any device in super speed without even bothering the CPU and using extremely low power is more appealing to some people then being able to do 3d rendering faster...because nobody in the desktop market does 3D, nobody being the amount of people that buy 5900 and 5950, it's a small amount of people. The AMD platform, on the other hand, is the more capable performer on battery power, and the more efficient of the two, especially with light daily use and video streaming. Some Intel Core i9 units are better optimized than others, though, so you can get longer battery life with some options that we got on the Scar 15 earlier in the year, when we tested it. Neither of the chips in our AMD Ryzen 9 7950X vs Intel Core i9-13900K faceoff comes with a bundled cooler, but Raptor Lake's higher power consumption means you'll need a beefier cooler to contain the Core i9-13900K than you will for the Ryzen 9 7950X. Pricing: Intel Core i9-13900K vs Ryzen 9 7950X P-cores? E-cores? As you can see above, putting these two chips head-to-head presents an issue: We have some new kinds of cores to talk about. The only cores with two threads are Intel’s P-cores, which results in an unbalanced ratio of threads to cores. When Intel is able to reduce the size of its manufacturing process to match that of AMD’s rival TSMC, it will also be able to use a more modern manufacturing method with a more efficient transistor design.The external thermal readings are very similar between the two models, so I’ve only included a reading of the Intel model below. W (~6-7 h of use) – 1080p fullscreen video on Youtube in Edge, Silent Mode, screen at 60%, WiFi ON; Platform pricing comes into play when you're making a purchasing decision, so here’s a pricing breakdown for Z790 vs X670E motherboards, along with the B650 vs B660 comparisons.
Based purely on core and thread count, then, the Ryzen 9 3900X is a likely better choice than the Core i9-9900K for 3D animation work, video editing, and other workflows dependent on a chip's core count. For example, if you're playing a PC game while talking to your friends on Discord, the load of the game will be handled by the P-cores, while the job of processing Discord is sent to the E-cores. This is all done through intelligent scheduling in Windows 11, via a service that Intel is calling Thread Director. The company says it plans to make this technology available only for that operating system. No Windows 10-based Thread Director is set for release. Here's a peek at the results we saw with the Ryzen 9 3900X versus the Core i9-9900K (as well as two other chips in their class) with a host of games on the RTX 2080 Ti and a synthetic benchmark... Finally, here’s how these two 2022 platforms fare in this stress test against their predecessors from 2021, the Intel Core i9-11900H and the AMD Ryzen 9 5900H. As mentioned already, the 12th gen Intel platform offers a massive increase in performance over the 11th gen i9, while the difference between the Ryzen 6000 and 5000 chips is much smaller, within 5% or so.
Lenovo Legion 9i review (2023 RTX 4080 model)
Intel's 10th Generation Core i9-10900K mainstream flagship CPU excels in elite gaming scenarios, but its aging architecture can't quite keep pace with AMD's newer, nimbler 7nm designs on value and multi-threaded performance. If intel couldn’t deliver more Cypress cove cores on 14nm because of size and power constraints, then with alder coming soon, Intel could just have ceded the i9 market for 6 months. If the 11900k was instead an i7-11750k, then it would’ve been compared to the 5800x and the 10700k, and it is a pretty significant upgrade above the 10700k. Quite impressive. Gaming performance has also been a traditional strength of Intel's desktop CPUs, in games at resolutions where CPU performance comes into play as the limiting factor. And for a while there, Intel hung on. Through the various "Lake" generations of processor starting with "Skylake," up against its successive AMD Ryzen challengers, Intel would sustain its lead in the one area that drives lots of sales of desktop processors among PC upgraders and builders: PC gaming.
Great Deal 
New Comment